Why have Americans always been so angry?
It's a familiar
narrative, one we all
learned as kids in
school. Mother England
began treating her
colonists in North
America as second-class
citizens. King George
III was a despotic
tyrant. Parliament
enacted laws as if to
punish the
colonies.
Those seemingly
punitive laws took the
form of acts passed by
Parliament to collect
taxes. There was the
Sugar Act of 1764 and
the Townshend Acts
(named for Charles
Townshend, Chancellor
of the Exchequer)
passed between 1767 and
1768. The Stamp Act of
1765 forced the
colonists to pay a tax
on paper items,
including newspapers,
pamphlets, legal
documents, and even
playing cards,
inspiring the famous
catch-phrase "taxation
without representation"
(the slogan survives on
Washington, D.C.
license plates.)
The bigger context
reveals that England
found itself in extreme
debt from having fought
the Seven Years' War
against France and
Spain, a truly global
conflict known in the
colonies as the French
and Indian War. Monies
raised went to
supporting the British
Army in North America,
a force, no doubt, to
advance England's
imperial ambitions but
one which also kept the
colonists safe from the
French, Spanish, and
rival Native American
nations.
And then there's the
dreaded Tea Act of
1773, the most odious
tax of all since it
placed a tariff on
imported tea. That's
the one that led to the
Boston Tea Party, where
masked
patriots—The Sons
of
Liberty—destroyed
a shipment of tea by
dumping the chests in
Boston Harbor.
Taxes on sugar and
tea—the idea!
Such draconian measures
led Patrick Henry to
roar: "Give me Liberty
or give me Death!"
Wonder what he would
have yelled if the
British had decided to
make him work without
pay on a tobacco
plantation?
What went missing in
our grammar school and
high school American
history classes was the
inconvenient fact that
the colonists enjoyed the
highest standard of
living per capita of
any people on the
planet—even
better than their
cousins back in
England. The average
annual income for
colonial Americans in
1774 was 拢13.85, the
highest in the western
world.
The colonists found
themselves on a
continent of largely
untapped resources
which, as far as they
were concerned, was
theirs for the taking.
And take them they did.
They declared the
preposterously named
New World theirs by
unilateral fiat despite
very real claims of
ownership by native
nations who'd been
living on the continent
for thousands of years.
The colonists laid
claim to endless
forests of old-growth
timber; water power for
mills via rivers and
streams; and fish and
game to feed an army or
pay for one (the pelts
of beavers, an animal
plentiful in North
America, were
practically worth their
weight in
gold—just ask
John Jacob Astor.)
And as for the labor
required to exploit
this bounty of
resources, the
colonists even enjoyed
unfair advantages
there: free labor forced
from slaves, a shackled
work force which grew
into a veritable nation
within a nation: by
1860, one of every
seven Americans was the
property of another
American—four
million men, women, and
children.
When Gandhi led his
famous Salt March over
150 years later against
the same empire, he
took the British to
task for taxing not a
luxury but a
nutritional staple. The
Salt Act of 1882
prohibited Indians from
collecting or selling
salt. Gandhi wasn't
trying only to repeal
an unjust tax, he
wanted the British to
leave the Indian
sub-continent, but it's
telling which taxed
item he chose to
protest.
The colonists were a
bunch of greedy
merchants and spoiled
consumers. They had
more material wealth
and comfort per person
than any other human
beings on earth but
that wasn't enough for
them. They were
actually willing to
risk their lives for
the promise of more
money. Were they being
oppressed? Hardly. Were
they being forced into
unpaid labor,
indentured servitude,
or slavery? Not at all:
the colonists were the slaveholders.
And it wasn't freedom
of speech or freedom of
the press or the right
to worship or not
worship the god or gods
of their choice that
compelled them to pick
up muskets. It was
money, plain and ugly.
As the poet William
Butler Yeats savagely
characterized such an
outlook, the colonists
yearned for the chance
to "fumble in a greasy
till // And add the
halfpence to the pence."
There have always been
two narratives of
American history: the
one we tell ourselves,
generation after
generation, which
concerns lofty ideals,
high-minded heroics,
inalienable rights, and
precious freedoms, and
the real story which
has always been about
dollars and cents,
profits and tax-dodges.
It's hard to
understand, but
Americans have been
angry right from the
start and their gripe
has always been about
money. Nothing has
changed.
|